If you’re thinking about how to make good decisions in your life, you might want to explore some strategic planning models.
Truth be told, I don’t know a lot about strategic planning – but the one thing that’s always stuck with me is this: “The cardinal rule is to take the path that allows you to change course if your initial decision proves wrong”.
This is an amazing explanation I think, as it addresses being proactive and mindful about our decisions. A significant number of us (counting myself for a long time) are too uninvolved about the choices we make that figure out where we end up. Without a doubt, there’s undeniable value in “taking the path of least resistance”, or confiding in the possibility that things will work out the manner in which they should. In any case, the issue is that when we set aside the effort to consider our lives, we see that things don’t generally turn out the manner in which we had trusted they would.
They state that knowing the past is 20-20, and lamentably the decisions we could have settled on are much more clear than the choices we’re confronted with at present. In any case, in the event that you accept that each and every decision can modify the occasions of our lives here and there, you’ll concur that as hard as it is in some cases it would most likely compensation to be progressively conscious with our choices.
At whatever point we’re confronted with a situation that requests a choice between at least two game-plans, the primary thing we have to do is escape our own specific manner. As it were, we have to honestly look at our own tensions, suppositions, and deliberate confinements, and hurl them aside. Choices are anything but difficult to make on the off chance that they’re founded on dread: we just pick the path of least resistance to evade any uneasiness. Be that as it may, this regularly isn’t the best choice over the long haul.
The second thing we have to do is analyze the real factors of the circumstance: “What’s extremely conceivable?” “What’s actually the potential effect of this choice over the other?”
At that point when we see a circumstance as obviously as possible, sensibly liberated from the billows of subjectivity, we can come back to the cardinal principle of vital arranging: “On the off chance that I settle on this choice and it turns out poorly, how troublesome would it be to course-right and pick an alternate way?” obviously following this rationale doesn’t naturally ensure achievement – yet in the event that we do need to change gears, we wind up sparing a ton of valuable time and exertion by having thoroughly considered it the first run through around.